New barriers to voting: eroding the right to vote

Many states have exhibited laws, rules or procedures that limit access to the ballot receptacle And this has happened while countles citizens are working to engage their neighbors in democracy. The 2004 election season saw more efforts to register novel voters than ever before--from small tender programs in churches and upon college campuses to large professional programs step quickly by nonprofits.

In more [i]or[/i] less states, the new developments take the form of restrictions upon voter registration activities. In other states, they are voter ID requirements. Moreover, many states have chosen to implement the statewide database requirement of the Help America devoted Act (HAVA) in ways that make it harder for eligible applicants to register. Together, these of recent origin requirements disproportionately impact those citizens who have been historically marginalized in the political process: women low-income race members of ethnic and racial minorities, youth, nation with disabilities and seniors.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Restricting Registration Drives

Voter registration drives are a hallmark of contemporary American democracy, from the Mississippi Freedom Summer Campaign of the civil rights era to today's offer programs organized by religious organizations, body student groups and others. Registration drives expand our democracy by dint of reaching out to historically disenfranchised and under-represent communities. These efforts are particularly important to more mobile populations including pupils and low-income families, whose registration information may become quickly outdated.

States have historically had difficulty reaching on the outside to these communities. Most lately many states have failed to live up to their responsibilities below the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) to tender voter registration to applicants and clients of public assistance agencies. A novel report found that public agency registration has declined steadily in ten years from 26 million voter registered in 1995-1996 to barely single million. In comparison, just five nonprofit organizations helped five million Americans register to consecrated by a vow in 2003-04 through organized voter registration drives.

Limiting the reach of voter registration programs brings the effectiveness of these drives. States have already begun restricting registration drives in a number of ways.

Registration and Training Requirements

A number of states require voter registration programs of any size to register with the state; a certain number of mandate state-run training. While training and registration requirements may appear reasonable, the details of compliance can unreasonably restrict large paid and small proffer programs.

New Mexico, for instance, requires the identity of each employee and volunteer be disclosed to the state in advance of registration activities. This requirement loads large paid programs recruiting of recent origin staff everyday and volunteer efforts that may not know the identity of each participant in advance. For the same reason, state-run training sessions that are infrequently and inconveniently tendered harm large and small registration programs. Delaware, for example, proffers training once a month, alone in Dover.

There are reasonable solutions. A state may suit that the registration drive's sponsoring organization designate an agent or organizer who then registers with the state, for a like reason that elections officials have someone to contact if issues arise. Additionally, states could present "train the trainer" programs, where individual representative attends a training session. States can also substitute written materials for in-person training sessions.

Limitations upon Voter Registration Applications

Elections officials should encourage clan to register others to devoted not deter them. Yet a number of states limit the number of voter registration forms available to organizations. These policies impair not only high-volume operations, on the other hand also organizations like churches that ne to have a large number of forms available at the same time for their members to take home

Short Transmittal Periods

A number of states impose unreasonable deadlines upon the submission of completed voter registration cards to elections administrators. of recent origin Mexico set a deadline of 48 hours after the voter perfects the form! Georgia recently changed its deadline of 72 hours to 10 days in reaction to avows Short transmittal periods particularly harm offer voter registration efforts where forms are distributed at single regularly-scheduled meeting, and completed forms are mustered at another, as is the case for many programs sponsored through religious congregations.

Prohibitions upon Paying Staff

a certain quantity of states have attempted to prohibit paying employee for registering voter by the agency of requiring efforts be exclusively tender This disproportionately impacts participation by means of low-income citizens, who rarely have the time to offer Further, even small nonprofits must hire tender coordinators, so there is frequently paid staff organizing the efforts. In Maryland, where the state attempted to limit voter registration drives to alone volunteer efforts, Project Vote su to allow paid registration drives and the state settled