Court rules that any party may expedite environmental lawsuit

A Placer shire judge's decision to throw without a mitigated negative declaration for an employee housing throw in the high Sierra has been upheld through the Third District Court of Appeal.

The appellate panel ground that the environmental document did not address the growth-inducing impacts of sum of two units new roads that would be under the orders of the housing project. However, the court published single the portion of its ruling addressing the procedural issue of whether the throw out opponents met California Environmental Quality Act requirements for expediting the litigation. The court place that the opponents had satisfied the requirement.

In September 2000 developer