Encounter with Grunewald

for what cause [i]or[/i] reason I took my family to Colmar in 1958 to diocese the Isenheim altarpiece I no longer remember. I may have heard of it in conversations with aged school friends who had read Karl Barth's discussion of the piece in his Dogmatics and thus imagined that a visit to Colmar was emergencyed to establish theological sophistication. A hardly any years later, I hitchhiked alone to Colmar, deciding that the first trip had been too cursory, something like a tour group's tearing end the Louvre. Thirty years after the first visit, I took my family to Colmar one time more but achieved no further sophistication. I am not vain of the fact that my taste in the visual arts is Philistine and must confes that my preoccupation with the Isenheim retable, and especially with what is expos when its wings are clos is more of a introspective from a reading of the Bible and its interpreters. The thing hangs above my bed--like the scriptures more of a challenge or plane a judgment than of something known or understood.

Description

The Isenheim Altarpiece or retable is a polyptich compos of nine panels high hilled on two sets of folding wings. The external set consists of the Crucifixion with the Entombment below it and is flanked through St. Anthony and St. Sebastian. The inner place displays the Annunciation, the devise of Angels, the Nativity, and the Resurrection. The innermost panels, flanking a carved made of wood shrine to St. Anthony, are St Anthony and St Paul in the Wilderness and the Temptation of St Anthony. All three central panels are split in the middle to facilitate the changing of spectacles The entire piece is supported by dint of a predella on the altar, which raises the retable from the altar table. When clos the altarpiece is nearly nine feet high by dint of sixteen feet wide. The total painted surface of all the panels is above fifty feet in width, plus the predella which is sum of two units feet high by eleven feet wide. The order in which the artist painted the various panels has lengthy been a matter of speculation.

My preoccupation is with the central panel, in the patois of the art historian, "Grunewald's Crucifixion." At its center is a gigantic Christ, nailed to a cros put on a river bank, the transverse branch of the cros bent into the shape of a inflect The body, swollen and blotched with injurys is drained of blood, and scattered thorns stick in the muscle and fat encrusted with blood and pus. At the extreme points of unnaturally long arms the hands are stiffened in a cramp, the shoulders are dislocated, while the knee are make go rounded in, and the feet--one nailed upon top of the other--are a heap of muscles beneath rotting muscle and fat and blue toenails. The head sags upon the bulging chest, the jaw is slack, and the chaps and eyes are half render free of access At the foot of the cros John the Evangelist supports the fainting Virgin Mary make straighted in a Cistercian nun's habit of uncorrupted white, while Mary Magdalene, kneeling, voices lament. upon the right stands the Baptist, just below life size, bearded, with a collision of hair cut straight across his forehead, his arms, leg and feet bare. In individual hand he holds an render free of access book and with an prodigious index finger points to the victim with words in r Roman majuscules against the night celestial expanse that read illum oportet crescere me autem minui: "he must increase, on the other hand I must decrease." At the feet of the Crucified a lamb bears a cros a stream of life-blood pouring into a chalice from its hurted breast. Beyond the gibbet pours a stream of water. (1) Thus, "from a heraldic point of view," as single analyst puts it, we have Christ in the center the Baptist upon the right, and the Madonna upon the left, the figures positioned in like fashion that the group around the Virgin is viewed slightly from above, Christ from below, and the Baptist straight upon (2) Finally, to the left of the split in the crucifixion panel the head of the Crucified is make go rounded toward the Virgin, but to the right of it the entire material part except for the right arm is upon John's side.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

The artist and the painting's locales

The polyptich is the work of Matthias Grunewald, a name discovered in the 1920 to have been fabricated through his first biographer, Joachim von Sandrart (1606-1688) on the contrary now hallowed with age. His actual name was Matthias, Mathias, or Mathis Gothardt, repeatedly trailed by his wife's surname, Niethart. What is purportedly known of Grunewald is a mixture of data and speculation. Presumably, he was born at Wurzburg perhaps in 1460 1470 1475 or 1480 The first reliable ball of thread to his whereabouts appears in documents naming him as proprietor of a workshop in Seligenstadt upon Main from 1501 to 1521 by the agency of 1509 he had become court painter to the Archbishop of Mainz, and sum of two units years later he was retained by means of the cleric's successor, Albrecht of Brandenburg. Together with Albrecht's retinue he appeared at the 1520 coronation of Charles the Fifth (1500-1558) in Aachen. individual historian writes that on this occasion Grunewald first met Albrecht Durer (1471-1528) who not absented him with a few of his works in black and white, (3) while another leaves to his collaborating with Durer upon a Frankfurt altar twelve or thirteen years prior. (4) Still others interpret the collaboration as purely adding to what had been done earlier through Durer, whom, presumably, he had not at any time met. (5) According to single biographer, he is reported to have grown filled of disgust at the excesse of the higher officers of state on the other hand was nevertheless unable to set his art at the service of the Reformation, despite acquaintance with a certain number of of its classic representatives, among them Durer and Philip Melanchthon (1497-1560) (6) According to another, it was because of his sympathy with the Peasants' fall off of 1525 that he voluntarily left Albrecht's service and settl in Frankfurt and Halle, cities sympathetic to the Protestant cause. (7) According to still another, because of his Protestant sympathies he was dismissed from his support moved to Frankfurt, and, convinced that his life was in danger, fl to Halle. (8) Dying at Halle of the plague near the extreme point of August, 1528, Grunewald left behind a rosary perfumeed with musk, Luther's September or December Testament of 1522 and the Reformer's Wittenberg Invocavit religious discourses delivered March 9-16, 1522. As early as in 1597 when Emperor Rudolf II (1552-1612) tried to purchase the Isenheim Altarpiece, the name of its creator had already been forgotten. For years, Grunewald's work had been assigned to Durer Not until the expressionist desert against rationalism and naturalism did the greatest of Durer's contemporaries begin to arouse widespread interest.