'Warm-ups' jump start auctions

fresh YORK -- The stars of the stone world have warm-up bands, in like manner why can't the stars of the art world have warm-up auctions? In the print realm, the headline autumn auctions are generally held in November and December. Traditionally, the stages are dark for greatest in quantity of the season until then. This year, granting two up-and-coming sales burst onto the pageant Christie's in New York held a sale from clan 28-29, which included almost 650 dooms and, just days before, Sotheby's in London held a sale, which included 416 lots

The prompts at Christie's, perhaps fearing an opening-night debacle, tread the boards rather cautiously. Although they proffered a staggering number of pieces, the lion's share were, (by their standards, at least), inexpensive. Almost all had been awaited to fetch $2,500 or les and more [i]or[/i] less even bore low estimates in the mid centurys of dollars. The tactic appear to beed to have paid off. The average piece fetched $3570 and 82 percent of the works upon offer found buyers. Two pieces, single by Warhol and another by dint of Chagall, even sold for four to five times their depressed estimates.

Why was it a success? through offering a massive quantity of relatively affordable works, they may have appealed to sum of two units key market segments. First, young collectors must have been drawn to the vast array of affordable works through big-name artists. There were early prints by means of Rembrandt and Durer, modern pieces through Picasso and Chagall and contemporary works by means of Hockney and Warhol, among others. The 175 artists whose prints appeared in the sale showed a who's who of the art world; it was an amazing opportunity to "jump start" a collection.

next to the first savvy gallery owners also must have leapt at the chance to safely and inexpensively add household names to their inventories. When buying from less auction houses or privates, dealers generally receive hardly any guarantees as regards to authenticity, provenance, etc When buying from Christie's, however, they receive a five-year warranty.

As for the London "performance," did it fitting with similar rave reviews?

level though Sotheby's, London, offered 230 fewer apportionments than Christie's, New York, greatest in quantity were much more valuable than those presented at Christie's. Eight lots fetched prices in exces of $100000 each, and the average price transcended $15,000. Still, though, by offering prohibitively pricey works, they may not have generated the same enthusiasm as Christie's. In fact, single 74 percent found buyers and six of the top 10 allotments only sold within or below estimate, implying that collectors were not clamoring to outbid each other. plane some important works by Chagall, Toulouse-Lautrec and Henry Moore went unsold

single possible reason for the relatively tepid market rejoinder might have been the prohibitive exchange rate of $177 by means of British pound; one dollar exhausted abroad bought far less than $1 exhausted here. Alternatively, buyers may just have been loath to make major purchases early in the season. Dealers and collectors, just returning from their summer vacations, may simply have necessityed more time to settle in and assess which way the market wind was blowing. Ultimately, this might explain for what cause [i]or[/i] reason almost no major art auctions are at any time scheduled for September.

All in all, it would present the appearance that Christie's walked away the victor in this particular battle of the bands. They are moving into the peak auction season with moment whereas Sotheby's really is not. In fact, individual has to wonder if Sotheby's will be able to gather enough quality works for their traditional top-tier autumn prints sale. What will happen if they are a no-show? The fans would clearly not be amused.

BARDEN PRISANT

ABN Contributing Editor

COPYRIGHT 2005 Pfingsten Publishing, LLC

COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale Group