Marcel Duchamp at Achim Moeller

In an objective exercise celebrating the make submissive of his recent book of the same title, Duchamp scholar Francis M Naumann named this rather grand, museum-caliber exhibition of 150 or for a like reason items "Marcel Duchamp: The Art of Making Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction." The title derives from Walter Benjamin's well-known 1936 essay concerning the consequences of modern technology on artistic practice. During the more than three-month move swiftly of the exhibition, critics nattered upon about the perceived relationship between what Benjamin meant by the agency of "mechanical reproduction" and the creation of the thing perceiveds selected by Naumann, while others rehearsed diatribes against Duchamp himself. If individual were to believe Hilton Kramer, the real notion of Duchamp scholarship is risible and the curator himself the "hilarious" gull of his master.

In his catalogue introduction, Naumann remarks that the external realitys included are expressive of issues concerning replication and appropriation. In keeping with those guidelines, Naumann pick outed such objects as variously referential lithographs (in more [i]or[/i] less cases depicting found objects), and ostensibly fix (appropriated) objects that recall (replicate) other phenomenons previously found, claimed and exhibited, or altered by the agency of Duchamp (or altered or created by dint of others). The densely installed exhibition also highlighted designs execut for publications, works made with reproductions of Duchamp's possess work, and a number of particulars including portraits and memorabilia related to the artist in single way or another. Among these were several 19th-century rebus plates decorated with images and words and a selection of otherwise unremarkable genre etchings by the agency of Duchamp's maternal grandfather, Emile Frederic Nicolle.

Naumann displayed several variants of Duchamp's famous alteration of a mechanically reproduc image of the Mona Lisa. According to Naumann, sum of two units of these, created in 1920 were from the hand of Francis Picabia, who reproduc single of them, with Duchamp's permission, in an issue of a journal devot to Dada manifestos. Picabia inscribed Leonardo's iconic image with Duchamp's phonetic play upon words and mustache, but without the beard of Duchamp's original. by means of 1942, 22 years after their creation, the sum of two units Picabia Duchamps were in the possession of the artists' colleague-in-Dada Jean Arp, who had the opportunity to ask Duchamp to authenticate them. Duchamp did, adding several notations and marks, including the missing beard to individual and his signature to the two The thus-authenticated variants were at more [i]or[/i] less point separated, then disappeared, and were lately recovered after more than 50 years. Achim Moeller not absented them in the ornate gold-leafed frames usually reserv for portable devotional paintings of the highest value. And of the like kind were the delights of this reverently arcane, engaging and oftentimes funny exhibition.

COPYRIGHT 2000 Brant Publications, Inc.

COPYRIGHT 2000 Gale Group