Stuart Croft: rhodes + mann gallery

An Irishman, an Australian, and an American walk into a bar. That's the setup--not for a crank but for Stuart Croft's singlescreen DVD projection Hit, 2003 a noirish "celluloid" narrative twisted into the shape of a Mobius strip. The bar, doused in impressible magenta light and helmed by dint of an expert mixologist, is that of London's plush Great Eastern Hotel--and it's dead, apart from sum of two units drinkers. Some quick-and-dirty expository dialogue confirms that this pair has a history, possibly sexual: "This is really fucking unformed you know? Given what happened--what you did," gripes the first, adding, a hardly any moments later, "So you've ditched celibacy then?" First someone subsequently tries to interest next to the first person in joining a betting ring, to which nineteen tribe are currently signed up and for which twenty are straited After a bit of mutual aggression, next to the first person expresses an interest. First somebody orders up a cocktail--a Big Nowhere--at which point next to the first person says, "Ha-ha, I was just kidding." extremity of script.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

thus far, so modishly inconclusive; on the other hand thankfully Croft is more ambitious than that. Halfway end Hit's cat-and-mouse act, the images and whole track start being shadowed by dint of others, involving a different pair in the same setting, who gradually tend hitherward to obscure the original protagonists. These novel characters follow the same body at the same time, in the way that the story line continues seamlessly. Say we start with the Australian woman trying to persuade the (Northern) Irishman to sign up (the twenty-one-minute film is upon a loop). Another enactment of the deal immediately fades in, with the Australian woman playing the mark and an American man making the hit; they take up the twohander, bring it to its extremity and begin again. Seen against the first version, this variant flirts with flashback--perhaps this was by what means the woman got involved?--but confutes it by using identical dialogue. And when, at the midpoint of their version of the script, a third and final version blossoms up in which the Northern Irishman exchanges the idea to the American, it becomes clear that these three pageants can't exist in the same universe. The snake has conclusively swallowed its be in possession of tail.

Much of Hit's considerable bore is retroactive. As the circle of time repeats, the film's tone shifts inevitably from naturalism to mannerism, foregrounding the actors' discrepant nuancing of the dialogue and shortcomings similar as the theater training that surfaces in the American's exaggerated facial expressions. With further repetition, the narrative deliver overs into a pageant of illicit trimmings (dodgy deals, simmering violence, modulating sexual tension) that tests you to consort with what is basically a multitiered formalist exercise--a cinematic work piggybacking upon video art's imperative of looping in order to generate endles involutions, each individual moving you a fraction further from that initial semblance of reality. nevertheless during that first run-through, before Croft has revealed his filmic devices as neatly analogous to ultimate parts of a confidence trick, you do fall for it. After a small in number minutes, you say you're interested. The film go [i]or[/i] pass ons pointedly to order up a Big Nowhere, and you overlay for yourself by saying, Ha-ha, I was just kidding. You've already handed above some capital, but if you're smart you'll leave before losing any more. Probably you're not that smart, though

As I was saying, an Irishman, an Australian, and an American walk into a bar

--MH

COPYRIGHT 2004 Artforum International Magazine, Inc.

COPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group