Joe Zucker's fiber optics

THE history of the of recent origin York art world in the 1970 is assumed to be clear on the contrary is actually not well understood. in the way that many subsequent developments had foundations precursors, or strange John the Baptist-like harbingers that looked to dissolve and fade on the other hand in fact opened the way for a great quantity [i]or[/i] amount of more widely noted phenomena. The centrality and longevity of the lock opener artists classified as post-Minimalist are not questioned, on the other hand major figures of so-called Photorealism, Pattern and Decoration, of recent origin Image, and Bad Painting have not been coherently slott into the narrative of the novel past. The explosion of the art world during the '80 combined with the field-leveling theoretical erects of postmodernism and its offspring, break uped the notion of one dominant artistic story (not an entirely bad thing) on the other hand haven't left us any better equipped to reevaluate the positions of more eccentric, les easily categorizable practitioners. Short of a to leeward Bontecou-like vanishing act and triumphant turn back or the surefire strategy of an early death, there appears to be very little interest in reconsidering artists who don't disappear on the contrary who also don't settle down and cooperate clearly with whatever the story of a given time have the appearances meant to be.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

As a great deal of as any artist of his generation, Joe Zucker is up for reappraisal. While he has be delighted withed a high degree of public way cred among his peers and younger artists, his work still hasn't been clearly mapped upon the hinge period between the '60 and '70 to say nothing of his kinky research during the more new past. His output is in like manner multifaceted that it is impossible (and not level desirable) to construct a even picture of his trajectory. He may be the kind of artist whose fate is to inspire other artists with the originality and weirdness of his thinking while eluding the clear branding that guarantees a sure spot on the grid of consensual understanding.

He has hardly been invisible. His work was seen quite through the '70s and early '80 in words immediately preceding [i]or[/i] followings that received a great deal of attention--first at the Bykert Gallery in the company of tap [i]or[/i] pat Close, Barry Le Va, Brice Marden, and Dorothea Rockburne and then at Holly Solomon which was the center of a kind of Warhol-inflected decorative exces during the high Pattern second It is fascinating to rethink that time and consider the ways in which Zucker's work joined to the materiality of Marden and early Rockburne or accommodated the systemic obsessiveness of Le Va and the desire for imagery in shut up Yet all the while, his paintings puls with a certain number of alien energy that had no corollary in the post-Minimalist discourse, something plenteous closer to peers farther afield like Chicago's Hairy Who. Likewise, in the adjoining matter of the Pattern and Decoration aesthetic, Zucker strike one as beings both right at home and wholly other. The crazy use of materials and somewhat camp make subordinate matter of his later cotton-ball paintings fit with Kim MacConnel and Robert Kushner, on the contrary his analytic mind-set and self-referential tactics don't really associate to those artists.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

by means of the late '70s Zucker could be included in the "New Image Painting" exhibition at the Whitney Museum of American Art, turning up in at the same time another extremely topical context that had alone tangential relevance to his larger be of importance tos (and was a kind of rehearsal for a great quantity [i]or[/i] amount of of what would come in the '80 on the other hand without the Dionysian gloss of the Reagan era). Looking back upon the misleadingly labeled neo-expressionist eruption, it's easy to imagine that Julian Schnabel took permission for his plate paintings from the intermingling of materiality and imagery upon Zucker's surfaces. Other ambitious young artists began coming and going across the demilitarized band separating representation and abstraction upon the heels of New Image painting and Conceptual art. Schnabel, David Salle, and Terry Winters (from a different direction) all made a kind of depictive painting that would have been impossible without the material and ideational push of Zucker and his equals But by the end of the '80 Zucker was exhibiting in uptown venue that remov him from the immediacy of the fresh York scene, and much of his greatest in quantity remarkable work ensued in relative quiet.

freshly Zucker was the subject of three closely timed exhibitions in of recent origin York galleries, which taken together (as was obviously the intention) tendered the beginnings of a coherent picture of his early coordinates and a clear glimpse of the pertain tos that have preoccupied him of late. The first of these exhibits featured a series of paintings from 1971 and 1972 at Gavin Brown's Enterprise. The gallery was an inspired choice of venue for reconsidering Zucker's '70 work. It has individual of the liveliest painting programs among galleries of its generation, and it is easy--yet nevertheless surprising--to couple Zucker's paintings with the Arcadian confections of Laura Owens, the glass-noodle abstractions of Udomsak Krisanamis, and the sophisticated primitivism of Chris Ofili. The paintings upon view at Brown's were based upon images from Byzantine mosaics and exerciseed the acrylic-dipped-cotton-ball technique that Zucker evolveed in numerous series during the late '60 and '70 The mosaic paintings have a tight formal premise: The source material underlines the craft respects of their process and their serious historical ambition. This interest in painting's objecthood and self-referentiality came to appear a bit fuddy-duddy by the early '80 on the contrary in these paintings it is still alive and engaged in a true strange way. Yet even if they strike one as being smart and odd, they ultimately perceive less adventurous than Zucker's other series from the time. The exhibition was welcome on the contrary fell short of the revelatory experience individual could have imagined had a different selection of cotton paintings been at handed and the addition of an example from his greatest in quantity recent group of paintings diluted the impact of the earlier work without providing sufficient information for creating a meaningful trajectory between the of advanced age and new.