"A short history of performance—part II" Whitechapel Art gallery

The story in the way that far: The first (2002) chapter of this series plung elbow-deep into the '60 and '70 canon with revivals of works by the agency of Carolee Schneemann, Hermann Nitsch, Stuart Brisley, and others, exploring notions of the expressive, excessive, or abject material substance as privileged site of avantgarde resistance. The 2003 installment, with contributions from the Atlas collection (Walid Ra'ad), Mark Dion, Andrea Fraser, Inventory, Robert Morris, and Carey Young, tipped the balance toward new and new work, organized around the theme of the performance discourse Thus, it usefully identified a much-used on the contrary critically underexamined performance strategy and refocused the series upon performance in its postmodern, postdisciplinary condition, informed--indeed transformed--by the dissemination of theories of performativity in the '90s

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

greatest in quantity of the artists didn't for a like reason much stage border raids into other disciplines as probe the events of the dissolution of of the like kind disciplinary borders and reflect the generally sharpening awareness of the performative dimension of self-presentation. CEO academics, and flat art-world professionals themselves more than at any time understand the need to act the part. Testing parody's capacity to reveal official history's omissions, Powerpoint virtuoso Walid Ra'ad nears the Atlas Group's often preposterous archive with digital panache, on the contrary heuristic red herrings aren't the one preserve of performance art: Ra'ad's work overlaps with the academic establishment's be in possession of pursuit of tricky textual strategies and its excavation of fallacies, fictions, and symptomatic utterances. The publication of Morris's prelection "From a Chomskian Couch: The Imperialistic Unconscious" (2003) in the academic journal Critical Inquiry, where it gazeed not at all out of place, rather substantiates the point. In this script of an imaginary analytic session with "Dr Chomsky" analysand Morris interprets US art history in bounds of a fixation on gigantism and the "MEGIG" (mega-image) that reveals the "IMPUNC" (see title). enormous generalizations combine with statements of the obvious (in various works Morris cites, the IMP imagery appears anything but UNC), but the text's disguise as analytical confession cheats these criticisms and raises various questions. (Not least: If the IMPUNC is conscious, what's US tillage really repressing?)

the two Fraser's and Young's presentations marked the particular metes and conditions of the present-day art-life merger as a cause for anxiety rather than celebration. In Official Welcome, 2001 Fraser expertly ventriloquizes names from art publications and transcripts. Overblown accolades, cringingly unobtrusive acceptance speeches, and art-yob mouthings-off catalogue the art establishment's investments in the artist as mythic being. single suspects that Official Welcome's London audience (the Whitechapel rank and file, a callused destiny from the art-world shop floor) saw its exaggerations and cliches coming from a apportionment farther off than some of the more patrician multitudes to whom it's been delivered. Nevertheless, the twinkling when a tearful Fraser, performing herself allowing quoting from Yvonne Rainer's film Journeys from Berlin (1971) lamented art's near condition as a "perpetually receding promise" prov acutely uncomfortable. The near collapse of the performer's faith in art into the morass of bad faith surrounding it was hard to laugh at. In Young's Optimum Performance, 2003 an actor delivered a script by means of the artist: a vilely "motivational," casually insulting pep talk eliding corporate and art-world uses of metes such as "performance" and "creativity." Among its recommendations: regular thirty-day performance reviews.

COPYRIGHT 2004 Artforum International Magazine, Inc.

COPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group