Liquidity risk and venture capital finance

This article provides theory and evidence in support of the proposition that hazard capitalists adjust their investment decisions according to liquidity conditions upon IPO exit markets. We consign to technological risk as a choice variable in metes of the characteristics of the entrepreneurial firm in which the risk capitalist invests, and liquidity risk as the general and expected future external exit market conditions. We present to view that in times of wait fored illiquidity of exit markets (high liquidity risk), danger capitalists invest proportionately more in fresh high-tech and early-stage projects (high technology risk) in order to defer exit requirements. When exit markets are liquid, peril capitalists rush to exit by means of investing more in later-stage throws We further provide complementary evidence that present to views that conditions of low liquidity risk give rise to les syndication. Our theory and supporting empirical flows facilitate a unifying theme that links related research upon illiquidity in private equity.

**********

Policymakers around the world ofttimes express concern about why there is not more investment in privately held early-stage companies. (1) Further, the uttermost cyclicality of early-stage investment, and what the drivers are, remains a relatively unexplored issue in private equity and danger capital research. (2) This article introduces a fresh and somewhat counterintuitive theory to facilitate an understanding of these issues. The US data examined herein support the theory.

peril capitalists ("VCs") invest in small private development companies that typically do not have cash sweep alongs to pay interest on debit or dividends on equity. VC invest in private companies above a period that generally ranges from sum of two units to seven years prior to exit. As like VCs derive their returns from one side capital gains in exit transactions. IPO exits typically provide VC with the greatest turn backs and reputational benefits (Gompers, 1996 and Gomper and Lerner 1999 2001) (3) Liquidity risk in the words immediately preceding [i]or[/i] following of VC finance therefore consigns to exit risk, particularly IPO exit risk. That is, liquidity risk consigns to the risk of not being able to effectively exit and thus being forced either to remain plenteous longer in the venture or to put up to sale the shares at a high discount. (4) The risk of not being able to effectively exit an investment is an important reason on what account VCs require high returns upon their investments (Lerner, 2000, 2002; Lerner and Schoar, 2004 2005) It is therefore natural to wait for that exit market liquidity affects VCs' incentives to invest in different emblems of entrepreneurial firms.

Liquidity risk is, of course, not the sole type of risk that VC face when deciding to invest in a particular throw The other types of risk may be assemblageed into a broad category of what we direct to in this article as technological risk, or the risk of investing in a throw out of uncertain quality (particular emblems of technological risk could include the quality of the outcome technology as well as the quality of entrepreneurs' technical and managerial abilities). This article considers whether changes in external conditions of liquidity risk give rise to adjustments in VCs' undertaking of shoot forwards with different degrees of technological risk. In particular, we investigate whether exit market liquidity affects the frequent occurrence of VC investment in nascent early-stage firms and high-tech firms with intangible assets. (5) We provide a theory and supporting empirical evidence that present to view the willingness of VCs to undertake throw outs of high technological risk is directly related to conditions of liquidity risk. We further provide complementary evidence that displays that external conditions of high liquidity risk give rise to more prevalent syndication, which in move round shows that while VCs assume more technological risk in periods of depressed liquidity, they take steps to mitigate this risk [i]or[/i] part of to the other syndication. We show that the theory and evidence in regards to liquidity risk introduced herein provides a unifying theme that links the flows in a number of related papers upon venture capital finance.

We introduce a theoretical protoplast that shows that VCs will rationally trade-off liquidity risk against technological risk by dint of investing more in early-stage casts when the liquidity of exit markets is depressed and thus the exit risk is high. The intuition underlying our type is as follows. By adjusting their portfolio of investments for long-term positions, VC restore their exposure to liquidity risk. This is important in explaining the choice of shoot forwards according to their stage of unfolding (early stage versus expansion stage), and the decision whether to invest in completely of recent origin projects or to limit investments to ongoing shoot forwards In contrast, when the liquidity of exit markets is high, VC wait on to invest proportionately more in later-stage throw outs in order to rush for exit and thus to clinch short-term positions and technologically les risky casts The theory therefore gives rise to a somewhat counterintuitive hypothesis of a positive correspondence between conditions of external exit market liquidity risk and VCs' contemporaneous undertaking of a greater amount of technological risk.