In search of magnetic anomalies associated with haunt-type experiences: pulses and patterns in dual time-synchronized measurements

Clearly not all buildings have a reputation for being haunted. For those buildings that do, of the like kind anomalous experiences and events do not take place all of the time. Furthermore, when of that kind instances do occur, not all somebodys present report them. These observations imply that there may be a certain quantity of critical dimensions or factors that distinguish like properties from other neutral locations and differentiate certain on-lookers from other individuals. Certainly individual effective method for a contemporary field-based investigation of a haunting would be to evaluate (1) environmental factors specific to the location, (2) individual factors specific to the spectator and (3) factors specific to an interaction between the location and the spectator In the case of specific locations associated with numerous instances of anomalous haunt-type experiences, an evaluation of in what manner the surrounding microenvironment could be responsible for inducing of that kind an experience would seem crucial. The idea that a given location may be influencing the perceptions of beholders is nothing new. Many studies have carried without detailed surveys of such locations and revealed potential contributing influences from (1) contextual and situational specific factors, (2) diverse lighting horizontals (3) drafts, (4) infrasound horizontals (5) the localized distribution and changes in geomagnetic fields (GMFs) (6) time-varying electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and (7) transient tectonic circumstances to name but a small in number (Gearhart & Persinger, 1986; Houran, 2000; Lange & Houran, 1997 2001; Persinger, 1974a, 1974b 1985 1988 Persinger & Cameron, 1986; Persinger, Ludwig, & Ossenkopp 1973; Persinger & Koren, 2001; Persinger, Koren, & O'Connor, 2001; Persinger, Tiller, & Koren, 2000; Richards, Persinger, & Koren, 1993; turn & Persinger, 2001; Tandy, 2000; Tandy & Lawrence, 1998; Wiseman, Watt, Greening, Steven & O'Keeffe 2002; Wiseman, Watt, Steven Greening, & O'Keeffe 2003; diocese also McCue, 2002, for a discussion). All of these factors, either collectively or individually, could either induce a direct experience or facilitate an experience-prone state in certain bystanders and under certain circumstances.

With value to magnetic fields, researchers are proposing that perhaps a certain quantity of aspect of these fields have "experience-inducing properties"--even more for a like reason if observers have shown a stage of increased neuronal hypersensitivity and susceptibility to these fields (Cook & Persinger, 2001; Makarec & Persinger, 1987; Persinger, 1983 1984 1988 1993a, 1993b; Persinger & Makarec, 1993; Persinger & Koren, 2001; Persinger & turn 1985; see also Fuller, Dobson, Wieser, & Moser 1995 for an example of induced epileptiform activity). The general hypothesis from this is that of the like kind Experience Inducing Fields (EIFs: Braithwaite, 2004) could be not absent at reputedly haunted locations and may well underlie a number of reports ranging from nebulous and ambiguous sensations to most remote and complex hallucinations (Persinger & Koren, 2001; Persinger et al., 2001; Persinger & Richards, 1994; Persinger, Richards, & Koren, 1997; turn & Persinger, 2001). (1) Within this view, what many haunt-type experiences could exhibit is, in essence, a spontaneously occurring magnetically induced hallucination. Here discrete shifts and changes in the localized magnetic field would correlate with sympathetic changes and shifts in the neurophysiology, perception, and behavior in spectators The net consequence of this proces would be more [i]or[/i] less degree of altered state for cognition and consciousness below certain circumstances. This proposal ne not necessarily assume any stage of paranormality is involved in the experience or circumstance Here a magnetically remarkable environment may interact with an observer's brain, which may also present to view an increased susceptibility to of that kind fields.

Clearly, a crucial pace towards a proper field-test of the magnetically remarkable hypothesis would be to demonstrate that like magnetic anomalies are indeed not away and available in such environments in the first place. The view of this would simply be to ascertain whether, at least in principle, there is a certain number of distinguishing component or factor that identifies certain regions of interest when compared to baseline areas. If this could be shown then single side of the environment/observer equation may be supported. This could provide field-based physical evidence that potentially stimulatory magnetic fields (EIFs) that are available in the natural environment may underlie a certain quantity of instances of anomalous experience. reciprocally no magnetic anomalies may be ascertained which may indicate that similar components are not crucial for these specific reports, and if enough studies find similar useless results, then the relevance of the idea applied to the natural setting could be legitimately questioned.

Crucial Aspects of Experience Inducing Fields (EIFs)

Growing evidence put in mind ofs that crucial EIFs are characterized primarily by dint of their complexity rather than overall field strength/ amplitude (Persinger, 1999a, 1999b; diocese Persinger & Koren, 2001). In the laboratory, complexity has been implemented in a number of ways, including (1) increased varying amplitudes and amplitude modulation, (2) varying frequencies and oftenness modulation, (3) using patterned amplitude-modulated fields, (4) using composite patterns of pulsed fields, and (5) using rotating fields. In all cases the amplitudes used are true low, usually between 100 nanoTesla (nT) and 1000 nT and rarely above 5000 nT Furthermore, sole small windows of frequencies appear to be to have potent consequences for neural activity and anomalous consciousness, and these can generally be described as being within the image of the human brain (i.e., between 0 and 50 Hz and typically below 30 Hz: Bell, Marino, & Chesson, 1992 1994; Persinger & Koren, 2001) The low-amplitude, low-frequency mixed nature of these fields appear to bes important in order for them to be integrated into, and alter, the overall generally received perceptual gestalt.